Lars, the big difference is that content on the OSGi wiki may be used as the basis of a future specification. Therefore contributions need to be treated in the same way as Apache and Eclipse handle code contributions.
Working at Adobe on things relating to OSGi and other standards/specifications. Note that any opinions posted here are my own, and do not represent anyone else or any organization.
That's really good news :)
ReplyDeleteAlthough, having to print out, sign, scan and then email back a document is a bit... awkward...
This is a bit odd too: "we did not place an edit button on the pages because that looks so, ehh, well, wiki like".
ReplyDeleteThat's what wikis are supposed to be like - in fact that's the whole point! ;) Wiki pages are *meant* to have edit buttons.
Hi remerson,
ReplyDeleteI think that other organisations, such as Apache and Eclipse have similar processes...
@davidb: The Eclipse wiki is open to everyone who has a bugzilla account. Signing such an agreement for editing a wiki is odd.
ReplyDeleteLars, the big difference is that content on the OSGi wiki may be used as the basis of a future specification. Therefore contributions need to be treated in the same way as Apache and Eclipse handle code contributions.
ReplyDelete